Quantcast
Jump to content

  • Do you own an ATV, UTV or SxS? Join our Community Forum!

    QUADCRAZY ATV Community and Forum are FREE to join! We keep our ATV, UTV, and SxS forums clean and user friendly. All first time posters in our forums will have to wait to have their content reviewed and approved. Once your first ten posts are approved, you will no longer need to go through a forum post approval process. To bypass the approval process with immediate access and a NO ADS experience in our ATV, SxS, and UTV forums, consider subsribing to a Premium Membership

Bigfoot Found In Georgia?


Recommended Posts

Bigfoot Found In Georgia?

Two Georgia men claim to have found Bigfoot in the northern woods of the state. They say they have a body, photos of the body, and DNA evidence which will be revealed this Friday, Aug. 15, at a news conference in Palo Alto, Calif. DNA evidence? Wait a minute, there is no comparison specimen, so there is no DNA analysis that can definitively identify Bigfoot tissue.

Interesting, also, the two men, Matthew Whitton and Rick Dyer, run Big Foot expeditions. This makes for great publicity for their company. They claim they found Bigfoot about two weeks ago and have put the carcass in a freezer.

thawed_bigfoot_creature_in_freeze_3.jpg

Here are some of the vital statistics on the "Bigfoot" body:

*The creature is seven feet seven inches tall.

*It weighs over five hundred pounds.

*The creature looks like it is part human and part ape-like.

*It is male.

*It has reddish hair and blackish-grey eyes.

*It has two arms and two legs, and five fingers on each hand and

five toes on each foot.

*The feet are flat and similar to human feet.

*Its footprint is sixteen and three-quarters inches long and five

and three-quarters inches wide at

the heel.

*From the palm of the hand to the tip of the middle finger, its

hands are eleven and three-quarters inches

long and six and one-quarter inches wide.

*The creatures walk upright. (Several of them were sighted on the

same day that the body was found.)

*The teeth are more human-like than ape-like.

*DNA tests are currently being done and the current DNA and photo

evidence will be presented at the press

conference on Friday, August 15th.

The creature was found by Matthew Whitton (AKA Gary Parker) and Rick Dyer (residents of Georgia) in the woods in northern Georgia. (The exact location is being kept secret to protect the creatures.)

Matthew Whitton and Rick Dyer will be flying in from Georgia to be at the press conference. Also present at the press conference will be Tom Biscardi, CEO of Searching for Bigfoot, Inc.

mathew_whitton_tom_biscardi_and_r_3.jpg

Check out these links:

The Criminal Report Daily : Investigation Discovery: Bigfoot Found? Intriguing Photographs and Exclusive Interview with Tom Biscardi

Bigfoot found in Georgia! Proof or hoax? - Posted

Searching For Bigfoot - Special Announcement

What do you think? Is it Real? Press conference tommorrow!

Do you think Bigfoot is real? Found a previous thread, POLL: VOTE HERE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another person, Biscadi or something like that, is also involved in the discovery...and he was found guilty of fraud some years ago for a similar revelation......

Hey...I'm a Bigfoot fan...and all for finding real, physical evidence...but this smells worse than ole Sasquatch is reported to smell ;)

Tom D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, I've been reading that about him on the message boards (Biscardi). I guess we'll see with this press conference tomorrow.

Here's another site to check out: Cryptozoology.com

Supposedly they are supposed to show the body, DNA results, pictures, etc.

Check out this thread: Georgia Bigfoot Body Thread - Bigfoot Forums

And this one that got a server overload: Do you think the guys in GA have a bigfoot body? - Bigfoot Forums

BIGFOOT (Site is currently down, probably overload)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GAGH!

Way too much to read....

But, I have to admit, the "monkey in the freezer" is not very convincing....

Again, I've been a Bigfoot fanatic since I was a kid and would LOVE for some empirical evidence to surface.....but I have a feeling this one is going to be disproved....

Time and data will tell....

-TD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its fake broski

i kno for one, i ride ALLL around the northern part of GA and the closet thing weve seen is a bear. there has been so many false bigfoots, thats it hard to believe it does exist

my dad has hunted in northern GA and TN border for over 15 years. and he agrees it is bullchit never a sighting

Georgia Bigfoot Body Hoax

here ya go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its fake broski

i kno for one, i ride ALLL around the northern part of GA and the closet thing weve seen is a bear. there has been so many false bigfoots, thats it hard to believe it does exist

my dad has hunted in northern GA and TN border for over 15 years. and he agrees it is bullchit never a sighting

Georgia Bigfoot Body Hoax

here ya go.

That's a good thread...looks more and more like a hoax based on the fact that these guys have lied in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally believe that there is a primate that lives in various regions. Almost every country and every region has some sort of Big Foot. For all those people that say that can't be real because they have never found remains or a skeleton. Chimpanzees, perfect example. We know they are real, how many remains or skeletons have they found in the wild? Less than 5. We know where they live, we know how long they live. Why can't we find their bones?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally believe that there is a primate that lives in various regions. Almost every country and every region has some sort of Big Foot. For all those people that say that can't be real because they have never found remains or a skeleton. Chimpanzees, perfect example. We know they are real, how many remains or skeletons have they found in the wild? Less than 5. We know where they live, we know how long they live. Why can't we find their bones?

maybe they implode when they die.:confused::laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or, maybe the Monkey Fairy flies in, takes the bones and delivers them to the Popo factory?

I didn't say that...it was all a dream....

We now return you to our regularly scheduled program....

Tom D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone see the press conference?

I didn't see it live....saw some clips on CNN.....

Sorry.....no Bigfoot this time boys and girls.....

And...I'll bet their "group of scientists" will say the corpse

is genuine......

And the "real" scientific community will not even know who

these guys are!

I don't get the motivation of people sometime....

If this is a real case, then I'll be as flabbergasted as everyone else;

they're handling it like a bunch of clowns......

-TD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what's disappointing is one of guys is supposedly a medically retired police officer.

The other is a corrections officer, but have read that he's a truck driver.

I just don't get it.....

-TD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but you want a REAL mystery beast?

21e9lwy.jpg

Montauk Monster.

im a fan of cryptozoology.

=] i know im a dork.

Yeah that Montauk Monster is most likely something that came off of Plum Island! All over the news in New York 2 weeks or so ago..

Plum Island Slightly Alters Official Line On Montauk Monster

fake, DNA tests proved the DNA samples were 96% human 4% opossum

They're going to give a better sample they said. I want to see the results of the autopsy! VIDEO!

Some pics from the news conference:

ba-bigfoot_claim_0498952078.jpg

ba-bigfoot_0498952122.jpg

ba-bigfoot_claim_0498952279.jpg

ba-bigfoot_claim_0498952183.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but you want a REAL mystery beast?

21e9lwy.jpg

Montauk Monster.

im a fan of cryptozoology.

=] i know im a dork.

Here is a pretty damn good "theory" on your monster.

It's been fun while it's lasted, but the monstrous creature that washed up in Montauk, Long Island may have been nothing more than a prop from an independent movie about carnies, and a viral marketing scheme just as everyone initially suspected. There are enough untied loose ends in the hoax storyline to leave open the possibility that the hoax is itself a hoax, meaning the story has now entered a confusing phase where one must carefully sift the professed deceptions from the real deceptions and hard facts from intentional distortions. But one can try. Here's how a hoax would have gone down, according to a theory propagated on a few websites (linked below) over the past few days:

The producer of the film, Darren Goldberg (pictured above), and/or his associates would have left two distinct props from his movie on beaches near Montauk. Some honest people came across these props and were fooled into thinking they were corpses. The first to surface was, as has been reported, photographed by the sister of a friend of publicist Alanna Nevitski, who forwarded the picture to Jezebel, which forwarded the picture to Gawker, which published it to mass hysteria.

Another picture, appearing less decomposed, was taken earlier in the day by Ryan O'Shea and Christina Pampalone and appeared in Newsday, which also reported tips from readers who had see the monster all over Long Island. It was later noted that, given the timing reported by Newsday, the body seemed to decompose awfully quickly over the course of one day. The paper also reported a sighting of a live version of the monster, which would have, under the hoax scenario, been made as part of the prank.

A group of three women later appeared on Plum TV to talk about discovering the monster and taking the photo that appeared on Gawker. One of the women was Rachel Goldberg, not identified at the time as the sister of Darren Goldberg, who is making the carnie movie, Splinterheads. The women insisted the creature "exists" and was not a Photoshop creation, and claimed they were looking for a scientist to study what remained of it. This seemed to jibe with what Colin Davis and their other male friends said on CNN. Both groups of friends would have been working in conjunction with the movie producer at this point to keep the hoax going. They claimed the body had already decomponsed to a bones and "goo," which they were keeping in a bag. One of the group later said, quite suspiciously, that the remains had been stolen.

The original supplier of the photo, Nevitski, told New York that Goldberg and the other women on Plum TV were "full of sh**" because Nevitski's friend, still anonymous, took the original picture. If the monster was a hoax, Goldberg would have seen the interview as a golden opportunity to inflate the hoax further by appearing on TV, but needed to lie about taking that specific picture in order to get in front of the camers. Nevitski's friend was refusing interviews. When she went on, Goldberg suddenly had a new, alternate picture of the monster, indicating she had her own, original photos.

Blogger Nicky Papers also thought the women were lying, and wrote on Montauk-Monster.com about their nervous ticks, like giggling and breaking eye contact. He also noticed that Goldberg talked first and her friends followed her lead.

The blogger was then contacted by a source who claimed Rachel Goldberg was related to Darren Goldberg. The source said Goldberg was making Splinterheads and that the monster will appear in the movie. This was the first time the movie was tied to the monster.

The website for the movie seemed to admit to the whole thing yesterday, posting, "We have the Montauk Monster." The blog for the movie also made an admission, linking to Papers' story and another hoax report and adding, "Thanks Darren's sister." The blog, especially, has enough content that it seems genuine, as opposed to the work of a prankster.

Arguments in favor of the hoax theory:

The body is missing, supposedly "stolen," a fishy story. Who steals a bag of bones and goo?

There has been no examination by scientists, as promised.

It's the simplest explanation. Occam's razor.

The movie people are claiming credit on their website and blog.

Goldberg and the other women were acting kind of funny on Plum TV.

Arguments against Splinterhead creating the monster:

Splinterhead is about a carnival. Why would there be monsters is such a movie? Further, it has been described repeatedly not as a horror or paranormal movie but as a comedy. Falsely claiming credit for creating the Montauk Monster would fit better with a comedy than actually having such an ugly creature in the movie, right?

The moviemakers never come out and say on their website or blog that they actually made the monster. They only imply it. Perhaps they are having a bit of fun.

There is no proof that Darren and Rachel Goldberg are related, only a statement on Darren Goldberg's blog, which could be a joke.

Papers is trying to sell montauk-monster.com. Maybe this is all a big scam to drive traffic to the site, somehow!

How has the story stayed under the radar all week? Montauk-monster.com had this days ago, why did it take so long for anyone to notice? And was Gotham News really the first news publication to cover the story, beating the TV people, blogs (save for Montauk-monster.com) and at least one newspaper on the case? How?

How could so many people have been fooled by a movie prop? Wouldn't it have looked suspiciously plasticky or something?

Either way, a movie has managed to attach itself, cheaply, to a fairly large media phenomenon. One way or another, it's guerilla marketing. And we all kind of new that's how it would end up, didn't we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...