Quantcast
Jump to content

  • Do you own an ATV, UTV or SxS? Join our Community Forum!

    QUADCRAZY ATV Community and Forum are FREE to join! We keep our ATV, UTV, and SxS forums clean and user friendly. All first time posters in our forums will have to wait to have their content reviewed and approved. Once your first ten posts are approved, you will no longer need to go through a forum post approval process. To bypass the approval process with immediate access and a NO ADS experience in our ATV, SxS, and UTV forums, consider subsribing to a Premium Membership

Presidential Vote - Who's your pick?


Who are you voting for?  

24 members have voted

  1. 1. Who are you voting for?

    • McCain/Palin
      16
    • Obama/Biden
      8


Recommended Posts

this matter comes to picking the lesser of the two evils. mccain is who i would pick if i could vote....BUT i wish huckabee made it in instead of mccain :skeptic:

IMO i cant see how anyone who remebers 911 can vote for obama(his possible relations with terroists). thats one chance i wouldnt want to take. to many shadowy corners to obama. to much "media tilt" on his side covering his as* most of the time with some of his issues.

for instance, his racist preacher. he speccifically said something that should never be said about our country in or out of the house of God. the media belittles that issue

but the media pounces all over Palins family because her daughter is pregnant. a quote from one of someone was "how can see run a country if she cant even control her daughter" my responce "could you keep it on your pants when you were 18?"

JMHO

im just ready for this election sh** to be over, im getting tired of hearing it all over television.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was originally for McCain, and liked the Palin pick, but she turned out to be a little too ditsy for president, in my opinion.

Come to find that, McCain is a psycho and gets out of control with his temper. That guy will have the nuclear codes. He's a Hot Head.

McCain's Temper May Become an Issue

ABC News: Will McCain's Temper Be a Liability?

Famed McCain temper takes a break on campaign trail - The Boston Globe

Report: McCain Exploded With Rage During Gambling Outing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a quote from one of someone was "how can see run a country if she cant even control her daughter" my responce "could you keep it on your pants when you were 18?"

JMHO

im just ready for this election sh** to be over, im getting tired of hearing it all over television.

I did say that, if one of my family members was in a political spot like that. You do what you can to NOT give your parent a bad name. Palin is a joke. She is not an outdoor person like she wants everyone to believe. A real outdoors person would not allow hunting from helicopters. She just needs to go back to Alaska and be invisible to the country again. If Hillary was not in the running at all this year, McCain would have never picked Palin. He picked her to make all the people who were upset that Hillary didn't get the Dem. ticket vote for him. It worked but she is a tool. So is McCain. Do we really want Bush for another 4 years with some twit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just what I want is "Obama Biden"ticket!

BUll$hit!!!!Sounds to much like the JackA$$ who was in charge of the 911 terror attacks.Also he looks and sound like the Rock with aids!

Like I said before who gets the president spot. It is what the rest of the elected officals do that matters! The presidental position is just a show and tell position. Strippers have more power than the president!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't really care who wins. I just think the Democrats are insulting the 911 tragedy and insulting the people who lost there lives because of it. Obama Biden are to close to Osama Bin Laden for me. I may not like how things are handled, but I'm not going to sell my soul either.

If they just would have picked Hilary, it would have been a voter land slide in her favor and we would be saying "John who?". The lady done a decent job of running the first 8 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JUST A THOUGHT: A guy had posted this as a bulletin on Myspace....he makes a few good points in my opinion...

I'm voting Democrat

I'm voting Democrat because I'm way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me and my family from murderers and criminals.

I'm voting Democrat because I love the fact that I can now marry whatever I want. I've decided to marry my horse this year. Next year my poodle.

I'm voting Democrat because I believe oil companies' profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't. Never mind that oil companies have to spend millions $$ to drill a single well, and have to drill hundreds of wells before a hit.

I'm voting Democrat because I believe the government will do a better

job of spending the money I earn than I would.

I'm voting Democrat because freedom of speech is fine until I am offended by it.

I'm voting Democrat because when our party thinks we are losing, we will subvert the elections process and register illegal non-citizens, skid row losers, make up names, and even register people's pets.

I'm voting Democrat because when we pull out of Iraq I trust that the

bad guys will stop what they're doing because they now think we're good people.

I'm voting Democrat because I believe that people who can't tell us if

it will rain on Friday CAN tell us that the polar ice caps will melt

away in ten years if I don't start driving a Prius.

I'm voting Democrat because I'm not concerned about the slaughter of

millions of helpless unborn human babies so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.

I'm voting Democrat because I believe that business should not be

allowed to make profits for themselves They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as THE GOVERNMENT sees fit.

I'm voting Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would NEVER get their agendas past the voters.

I'm voting Democrat because I love to hit on the wealthy that forces them to move their money overseas, never mind that the wealthy create jobs, stimulate investments and are crucial to a healthy economy.

I'm voting Democrat because I have not learned from the Cubans who

wanted CHANGE and brought in Castro because he simply "promised" change.

I'm voting Democrat because my head is so firmly planted up my $ss it's unlikely that I'll ever have another point of view.

"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Body count. In the last six months 292 killed (murdered) in Chicago, 221 killed in Iraq.

Sens. Barack Obama & Dick Durbin,

Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.,

Gov. Rod Blagojevich,

House leader Mike Madigan,

Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan (daughter of Mike),

Mayor Richard M. Daley (son of former Mayor Richard J. Daley).....

The leadership in Illinois... all Democrats.

Chicago is a combat zone. Of course they're all blaming each other.

Can't blame Republicans, they're aren't any!

State pension fund $44 Billion in debt, worst in country.

Cook County (Chicago) sales tax 10.25% - highest in country. (Look'em up if you want).

Chicago school system one of the worst in country.

This is the political culture that Obama comes from in Illinois.

He's gonna 'fix' Washington politics?

I realize the above statement is about Obama, but this is going to be the out come for the country no matter who get the show boat position.

Also a topic the two retards for Pres also forgot about.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjFiHENNf9Q]YouTube - Ted Nugent on Border Security[/ame]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wouldnt vote for someone who is pals with someone who is a terrorist.

just because McCain is a Republican doesn't mean he is just like Bush. he has different ideas.

McRage has supported Bush plans too much to be able to change. This country needs a drastic economic change. I'm not 100% set on Obama, but he has the most change in his plan and will get the most done being that Washington will be Democrat heavy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm picking Obama because he promised me I wouldn't have to pay any more capital gain taxes for my small business in a commercial.. that would help so mush with business.. but wait... Oh crap..... Hold on... Small business's are exempt from capitol gains tax already aren't they?? In the end we would end up paying more on income tax, but be able to compensate and line our pockets with money that doesn't exist!! LoL..

Obama offers alot of big lofty changes.. In a perfect world and a socialistic government, where we all love eachother and pay people just to be here with money we didn't earn, this would be great!.. If he was standing for such a large change, why has our economy nose dived since he and friends have came into power in the Senate???????????? They have more say in the economy than the president does..

Have any of you noticed gas prices lately?? 2.17 a gallon here in GA.. $2 dollar drop in under 2 months..????? There is your dying economy. It was sky high while our economy fell, but gas dropped when the world's economy shook last month. Gas companies realized their record earnings were gonna disappear for 2 things:

1.. U.S. Depression, Global recession.. no buyers in the market....

2.. Our leaders push for local drilling.. and the snake feeding the terrorist in the middle east is

Beheaded!, our money stays on OUR SHORES..

If you want to talk about money disappearing to the war in Iraq....... Ok, tell me how much of that money was spent on foreign resources, and how much was spent on domestic goods and human resources that ultimately boost our economy.. I beleive the majority of that money never left our shores?? Correct me if i'm wrong please..

Personaly, i dont agree with everything Bush has done, there were alot of things he needed to deal with that got ignored, but he also has been pretty distracted by this war, and everybody around him playing partisan politics.. Our economy has nearly been bled to death, not by Bush, Not by this war, But by the Oil Companies that are trying to put a bandage on the hole their knife made in our back. their bandage will work if its not to late. If gas prices fall a little more or just stay whare they are, it will take 2 years to get back on track and begin to move on. Politicians will begin to take credit for an economy they have not assisted. Democrats say they will have our economy strong if they get in.. Our economy staggering to its feet without their help right now.

So what good is a good economy without national security. I'm voting for McCain because he will take care of business in the military aspect so our economy will be shored up by a military that is ready to protect it.!

Just my 2 cents... Ya daddy loves ya! Go vote and make it count!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama is opposed to drilling as is Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. Gas prices will skyrocket.

Please don't vote for Obama. Read what else is in store for us if he's elected.

"Obama's Carbon Ultimatum" -

From the Wall Street Journal - October 20, 2008

"For years, Democrats -- including Senator Obama

-- have been howling about the 'politicization' of

the EPA, which has nominally been part of the Bush

Administration.

The complaint has been that the White House blocked

EPA bureaucrats from making the so-called

'endangerment finding' on carbon.

Now it turns out that a President Obama would

himself wield such a finding as a political

bludgeon.

He plans to issue an ultimatum to Congress:

Either impose new taxes and limits on carbon

that he finds amenable, or the EPA carbon

police will be let loose to ravage the

countryside." -- The Wall Street Journal

"Obama's Carbon Ultimatum"

Wall Street Journal Editorial -- October 20, 2008

Liberals pretend that only President Bush is

preventing the U.S. from adopting some global

warming "solution." But occasionally their mask

slips. As Barack Obama's energy adviser has now

made clear, the would-be President intends to

blackmail -- or rather, greenmail -- Congress into

falling in line with his climate agenda.

Jason Grumet is currently executive director of an

outfit called the National Commission on Energy

Policy and one of Mr. Obama's key policy aides. In

an interview last week with Bloomberg, Mr. Grumet

said that come January the Environmental

Protection Agency "would initiate those

rulemakings" that classify carbon as a dangerous

pollutant under current clean air laws.

That move would impose new regulation and taxes

across the entire economy, something that is usually

the purview of Congress. Mr. Grumet warned that "in

the absence of Congressional action" 18 months

after Mr. Obama's inauguration, the EPA would move

ahead with its own unilateral carbon crackdown

anyway.

Well, well. For years, Democrats -- including

Senator Obama -- have been howling about the

"politicization" of the EPA, which has nominally

been part of the Bush Administration.

The complaint has been that the White House blocked

EPA bureaucrats from making the so-called

"endangerment finding" on carbon. Now it turns out

that a President Obama would himself wield such a

finding as a political bludgeon.

He plans to issue an ultimatum to Congress: Either

impose new taxes and limits on carbon that he finds

amenable, or the EPA carbon police will be let loose

to ravage the countryside.

The EPA hasn't made a secret of how it would like

to centrally plan the U.S. economy under the 1970

Clean Air Act. In a blueprint released in July,

the agency didn't exactly say it'd collectivize

the farms -- but pretty close, down to the "grass

clippings."

The EPA would monitor and regulate the

carbon emissions of "lawn and garden equipment" as

well as everything with an engine, like cars,

planes and boats. Eco-bureaucrats envision

thousands of other emissions limits on all types

of energy.

Coal-fired power and other fossil fuels

would be ruled out of existence, while all other

prices would rise as the huge economic costs of

the new regime were passed down the energy chain

to consumers.

These costs would far exceed the burden of a

straight carbon tax or cap-and-trade system

enacted by Congress, because the Clean Air Act was

never written to apply to carbon and other

greenhouse gases.

It's like trying to do brain surgery with a butter knife.

Mr. Obama wants to move ahead anyway because

he knows that the costs of any carbon program will

be high. He knows, too, that Congress -- even with

strongly Democratic majorities -- might still balk at

supporting tax increases on their constituents, even

if it is done in the name of global warming.

Climate-change politics don't break cleanly along

partisan lines. The burden of a carbon clampdown

will fall disproportionately on some states over

others, especially the 25 interior states that get

more than 50% of their electricity from coal.

Rustbelt manufacturing states like Ohio, Michigan

and Pennsylvania will get hit hard too. Once

President Bush leaves office, the coastal

Democrats pushing hardest for a climate change

program might find their colleagues splitting off,

especially after they vote for a huge tax increase

on incomes.

Thus Messrs. Obama and Grumet want to invoke a

political deus ex machina driven by a faulty

interpretation of the Clean Air Act to force

Congress's hand.

Mr. Obama and Democrats can then

tell Americans that Congress must act to tax and

regulate carbon to save the country from even

worse bureaucratic consequences. It's Mr. Obama's

version of Jack Benny's old "your money or your

life" routine, but without the punch line.

The strategy is most notable for what it says

about the climate-change lobby and its new

standard bearer. Supposedly global warming is the

transcendent challenge of the age, but Mr. Obama

evidently doesn't believe he'll be able to

convince his own party to do something about it

without a bureaucratic ultimatum.

Mr. Grumet justified it this way: "The U.S. has to

move quickly domestically ... We cannot have a

meaningful impact in the international discussion

until we develop a meaningful domestic consensus."

Normally a democracy reaches consensus through

political debate and persuasion, but apparently

for Mr. Obama that option is merely a nuisance.

It's another example of "change" you'll be given

no choice but to believe in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little boy goes to his dad and asks, 'What is Politics?'

Dad says, 'Well son, let me try to explain it this way:

I am the head of the family , so call me The President.

Your mother is the administrator of the money, so! we call her the

Government.

We are here to take care of your needs, so we will call you

the People.

The nanny, we will consider her the

Working Class.

And your baby brother, we will call him the Future.

Now think about that and see if it makes sense.'

So the little boy! Goes off to bed thinking about what Dad has said.

Later that night, he hears his baby brother crying, so he gets up to

check on him.

He finds that the baby has severely

soiled his diaper.

So the little boy goes to his parents' room and finds his mother asleep.

Not wanting to wake her, he goes to the nanny's room Finding the door

locked, he peeks in the keyhole and sees his father in bed with the

nanny.

He gives up and goes back to bed.

The next morning, the little boy says to his father, 'Dad, I think I

understand the concept of politics now.'

The father says, 'Good, son, tell me in your own words what you think

politics is all about.'

The little boy replies,

'The President is screwing the Working Class while the Government is

sound asleep.

The People are being ignored and the

Future is in deep sh!t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Associated Press: AP: Obama aunt from Kenya living in US illegally

AP: Obama aunt from Kenya living in US illegally

By EILEEN SULLIVAN and ELLIOT SPAGAT – 32 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Barack Obama's aunt, a Kenyan woman who has been quietly living in public housing in Boston, is in the United States illegally after an immigration judge rejected her request for asylum four years ago, The Associated Press has learned.

Zeituni Onyango, 56, referred to as "Aunti Zeituni" in Obama's memoir, was instructed to leave the United States by a U.S. immigration judge who denied her asylum request, a person familiar with the matter told the AP late Friday. This person spoke on condition of anonymity because no one was authorized to discuss Onyango's case.

Information about the deportation case was disclosed and confirmed by two separate sources, one of them a federal law enforcment official. The information they made available is known to officials in the federal government, but the AP could not establish whether anyone at a political level in the Bush administration or in the McCain campaign had been involved in its release.

Onyango's refusal to leave the country would represent an administrative, non-criminal violation of U.S. immigration law, meaning such cases are handled outside the criminal court system. Estimates vary, but many experts believe there are more than 10 million such immigrants in the United States.

The AP could not reach Onyango immediately for comment. No one answered the telephone number listed in her name late Friday. It was unclear why her request for asylum was rejected in 2004.

Onyango is not a relative whom Obama has discussed in campaign appearances and, unlike Obama's father and grandmother, is not someone who has been part of the public discussion about his personal life.

A spokeswoman for U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Kelly Nantel, said the government does not comment on an individual's citizenship status or immigration case.

Onyango's case — coming to light just days before the presidential election — led to an unusual nationwide directive within Immigrations and Customs Enforcement requiring any deportations prior to Tuesday's election to be approved at least at the level of ICE regional directors, the U.S. law enforcement official told the AP.

The unusual directive suggests that the Bush administration is sensitive to the political implications of Onyango's case coming to light so close to the election.

Kenya is in eastern Africa between Somalia and Tanzania. The country has been fractured in violence in recent years, including a period of two months of bloodshed after December 2007 that killed 1,500 people.

The disclosure about Onyango came just one day after Obama's presidential campaign confirmed to the Times of London that Onyango, who has lived quietly in public housing in South Boston for five years, was Obama's half aunt on his father's side.

It was not immediately clear how Onyango might have qualified for public housing with a standing deportation order.

Spagat reported from New York.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this shocked me when i read about it...he wants to create his own civilian army "brown Shirts?" Obama's 'civilian national security force'

Jul 15, 2008 ... Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? ...

Obama's 'civilian national security force' - 29k - Cached - Similar pages

RED SOUNDING: Obama Calls for a Domestic Military Force

Obama Calls for a Domestic Military Force. Posted by Philip Eveland at 18 Jul 2008, 5:23 PM and is filed under Politics. Sen. Barack Obama has a plan for ...

RED SOUNDING: Obama Calls for a Domestic Military Force - 53k - Cached - Similar pages

About Obama’s / Alinsky’s Civilian National Security Force « Count ...

We’re getting a more complete picture of Barack Obama’s draconian plans to create a domestic army of radical extremists promoting bigger and more intrusive ...

About Obama’s / Alinsky’s Civilian National Security Force Count Us Out - 38k - Cached - Similar pages

Hot Air » Blog Archive » Are the media airbrushing Obama’s ...

It’s not quite clear what Obama meant by this. If he meant that the military had taken over too many functions that normally should be handled by the State ...

Hot Air Blog Archive Are the media airbrushing Obama’s speeches? Update: Wouldn’t ICE qualify? - 59k - Cached - Similar pages

Dedroidify: Obama calls for domestic “security force” as powerful ...

Obama calls for domestic “security force” as powerful as U.S. mi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...