trailblazer_02

hmm..im not sure what size my fronts are but they are small...

but i cant find any affordable tires.

that will be another purchase ill make after everything else lol.

i like holeshots..

holeshot XC's are nice,.

but now im focusing on the task at hand.

YAY 2000 MEMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :aargh::aargh:

another hate : energy drinks that make your mouth feel like you just ate sand after one drink.

lol

Why on earth would you do that? Did you want a heart attack? One makes me pee like I have the bladder of a squirrel.

lol energy drinks are SO expensive..

im buying a 12 pack of 8 oz red bulls for labor day weekend...and its 20$

lucky my parents are helping.

truth.

a clutch kit is only like 108$ some places. ill just get one when i get more money..

then it will be bad as*.

lol

oh yeah and tires...should i stay with the stock size? 22?

or lower?

i was thinking maybe 20's?

some deathcore should do just fine.

soem good sounding suicide silence, carnifex, or some annotations of an autopsy.

oh this reminds me of a video.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlQrRld2vpM]YouTube - Grindcore wedding[/ame]

NOW THATS A WEDDING!

lol jk i hate that genre of music..in the vid i mean..the kind i listed is good.

lol

k brb let me buy a race chassis from AZ bad boys and a 440 exterminator motor and ill race ya.

o yeah i forgot. with that kit. it comes with stuff for clutching too..so add that to the equation. still the FMF?

they say the 440 exterminator is about 68-70 hp at your fingertips..now thats a scrammy!

lol

cheapest bore kit is a 265cc and its 500$

i only have 400$ to work with.

my plans:

exhaust - FMF Fatty

Clamp on K&N with outerwears

Hot shot CDI

Jetted

a clutch kit... <- when i get more money.

FMF it is. for sure. ill order jets from hot seat and jet it myself.

i just have to figure out the jetting specs.

im leaning twords FMF.

come on ppl. need opinons.

i hate cocky quad owners that think their quad will smash any quad when in reality they own a stock rappy 700 or stock 450r or a can-am. and people who claim theyre quad does 90 when in reality it does about 74.

lol.

WHICH.

come on bot. stay with me

FMF or RCR.

the RCR comes with the jet kit and stuff. thats the only reason im looking at it.

the FMF is supposed to give WAY better gains though.

huh? the complete exhaust i will feel LESS of a gain?

the kit is a jet kit,complete exhaust,airbox vents and filter <- which i dont need, and parts for clutching.

yeah i know. i decided on that and the CDI for my bday.

but i can get the RCR stage one kit or an FMF complete exhaust for xmas.

idk what to choose.

a clamp on eliminates the airbox all together.

its just a filter that straps to your carb.

no airbox.

oh and i could instead get the FMF fatty and powercore complete exhaust instead of the kit,

reviving this thread for once again another decision to be made!

ok so my bday is like less than a month away..

my parents are giving me 100$

i want to know peoples thoughts on a clamp on K&N and an outerwear.

im looking at a hot shot CDI and Clamp on kit with the outerwears for around 100$

good ?

then when i buy the RCR stage one kit. ill just sell the new filter and airbox vents on ebay for like 20-30$ and make some money back.

perfect chance to get your own 450!

=]]

lol wow i want one they are only 310lbs.

FREAKING SWEET:yes:

i posted it a while back.

tattoo chicks are hot.

like Kat Von D.

wow.

Here is a pretty damn good "theory" on your monster.

It's been fun while it's lasted, but the monstrous creature that washed up in Montauk, Long Island may have been nothing more than a prop from an independent movie about carnies, and a viral marketing scheme just as everyone initially suspected. There are enough untied loose ends in the hoax storyline to leave open the possibility that the hoax is itself a hoax, meaning the story has now entered a confusing phase where one must carefully sift the professed deceptions from the real deceptions and hard facts from intentional distortions. But one can try. Here's how a hoax would have gone down, according to a theory propagated on a few websites (linked below) over the past few days:

The producer of the film, Darren Goldberg (pictured above), and/or his associates would have left two distinct props from his movie on beaches near Montauk. Some honest people came across these props and were fooled into thinking they were corpses. The first to surface was, as has been reported, photographed by the sister of a friend of publicist Alanna Nevitski, who forwarded the picture to Jezebel, which forwarded the picture to Gawker, which published it to mass hysteria.

Another picture, appearing less decomposed, was taken earlier in the day by Ryan O'Shea and Christina Pampalone and appeared in Newsday, which also reported tips from readers who had see the monster all over Long Island. It was later noted that, given the timing reported by Newsday, the body seemed to decompose awfully quickly over the course of one day. The paper also reported a sighting of a live version of the monster, which would have, under the hoax scenario, been made as part of the prank.

A group of three women later appeared on Plum TV to talk about discovering the monster and taking the photo that appeared on Gawker. One of the women was Rachel Goldberg, not identified at the time as the sister of Darren Goldberg, who is making the carnie movie, Splinterheads. The women insisted the creature "exists" and was not a Photoshop creation, and claimed they were looking for a scientist to study what remained of it. This seemed to jibe with what Colin Davis and their other male friends said on CNN. Both groups of friends would have been working in conjunction with the movie producer at this point to keep the hoax going. They claimed the body had already decomponsed to a bones and "goo," which they were keeping in a bag. One of the group later said, quite suspiciously, that the remains had been stolen.

The original supplier of the photo, Nevitski, told New York that Goldberg and the other women on Plum TV were "full of sh**" because Nevitski's friend, still anonymous, took the original picture. If the monster was a hoax, Goldberg would have seen the interview as a golden opportunity to inflate the hoax further by appearing on TV, but needed to lie about taking that specific picture in order to get in front of the camers. Nevitski's friend was refusing interviews. When she went on, Goldberg suddenly had a new, alternate picture of the monster, indicating she had her own, original photos.

Blogger Nicky Papers also thought the women were lying, and wrote on Montauk-Monster.com about their nervous ticks, like giggling and breaking eye contact. He also noticed that Goldberg talked first and her friends followed her lead.

The blogger was then contacted by a source who claimed Rachel Goldberg was related to Darren Goldberg. The source said Goldberg was making Splinterheads and that the monster will appear in the movie. This was the first time the movie was tied to the monster.

The website for the movie seemed to admit to the whole thing yesterday, posting, "We have the Montauk Monster." The blog for the movie also made an admission, linking to Papers' story and another hoax report and adding, "Thanks Darren's sister." The blog, especially, has enough content that it seems genuine, as opposed to the work of a prankster.

Arguments in favor of the hoax theory:

The body is missing, supposedly "stolen," a fishy story. Who steals a bag of bones and goo?

There has been no examination by scientists, as promised.

It's the simplest explanation. Occam's razor.

The movie people are claiming credit on their website and blog.

Goldberg and the other women were acting kind of funny on Plum TV.

Arguments against Splinterhead creating the monster:

Splinterhead is about a carnival. Why would there be monsters is such a movie? Further, it has been described repeatedly not as a horror or paranormal movie but as a comedy. Falsely claiming credit for creating the Montauk Monster would fit better with a comedy than actually having such an ugly creature in the movie, right?

The moviemakers never come out and say on their website or blog that they actually made the monster. They only imply it. Perhaps they are having a bit of fun.

There is no proof that Darren and Rachel Goldberg are related, only a statement on Darren Goldberg's blog, which could be a joke.

Papers is trying to sell montauk-monster.com. Maybe this is all a big scam to drive traffic to the site, somehow!

How has the story stayed under the radar all week? Montauk-monster.com had this days ago, why did it take so long for anyone to notice? And was Gotham News really the first news publication to cover the story, beating the TV people, blogs (save for Montauk-monster.com) and at least one newspaper on the case? How?

How could so many people have been fooled by a movie prop? Wouldn't it have looked suspiciously plasticky or something?

Either way, a movie has managed to attach itself, cheaply, to a fairly large media phenomenon. One way or another, it's guerilla marketing. And we all kind of new that's how it would end up, didn't we?

i diddnt read that but if thats all about that movie. they are just trying to get the publicity.

but you want a REAL mystery beast?

Montauk Monster.

im a fan of cryptozoology.

=] i know im a dork.

fake, DNA tests proved the DNA samples were 96% human 4% opossum

lol funny.

polishing to wooden floors in 3.2 seconds.

impressive.